exploit the possibilities
Home Files News &[SERVICES_TAB]About Contact Add New

Blogger_HTTP_response_splitting.txt

Blogger_HTTP_response_splitting.txt
Posted Jan 25, 2006
Authored by Meder Kydyraliev | Site o0o.nu

Blogger's personal page redirection mechanism contains a classic HTTP response splitting vulnerability in the "Location" HTTP header. The problem occurs due to use of unsanitized user-supplied data in the "Location" HTTP header, which enables attacker to inject CRLF(%0d%0a) characters thus splitting server's response taking full control over the contents of second HTTP response. Exploitation of the vulnerability can lead to cross-site scripting (XSS), cache poisoning and phishing attacks.

tags | advisory, web, xss
SHA-256 | b1bba7cc5beca200d483fb1ac898c490176fc394f70bf51480e8ff51ed266fc0

Blogger_HTTP_response_splitting.txt

Change Mirror Download

Blogger.com classic HTTP response splitting vulnerability
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

0. Original Advisory
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://o0o.nu/~meder/o0o_Blogger_HTTP_response_splitting.txt


I. Background
~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Blogger.com is Google's blogging service.


II. Description
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Blogger's personal page redirection mechanism contains a classic HTTP
response splitting vulnerability in the "Location" HTTP header. The
problem occurs due to use of unsanitized user-supplied data in the
"Location" HTTP header, which enables attacker to inject CRLF(%0d%0a)
characters thus splitting server's response taking full control over
the contents of second HTTP response. Exploitation of the vulnerability
can lead to cross-site scripting (XSS), cache poisioning and phishing
attacks.

The following URL was taking contents of query string and using it in
"Location" HTTP header without proper sanitation:

http://www.blogger.com/r?[URL here]


III. Vendor status
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Vulnerability has been fixed on 13/01/2006


IV. Disclosure timeline
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

02/01/2006 - Issue discovered. Vendor notified.
02/01/2006 - Initial vendor response.
12/01/2006 - Vendor inquired on status.
13/01/2006 - Vendor response and confirmation that bug fixed.


V. References
~~~~~~~~~~~~~

1. http://www.packetstormsecurity.org/papers/general/whitepaper_httpresponse.pdf


--
http://o0o.nu/~meder
Login or Register to add favorites

File Archive:

May 2024

  • Su
  • Mo
  • Tu
  • We
  • Th
  • Fr
  • Sa
  • 1
    May 1st
    44 Files
  • 2
    May 2nd
    5 Files
  • 3
    May 3rd
    11 Files
  • 4
    May 4th
    0 Files
  • 5
    May 5th
    0 Files
  • 6
    May 6th
    0 Files
  • 7
    May 7th
    0 Files
  • 8
    May 8th
    0 Files
  • 9
    May 9th
    0 Files
  • 10
    May 10th
    0 Files
  • 11
    May 11th
    0 Files
  • 12
    May 12th
    0 Files
  • 13
    May 13th
    0 Files
  • 14
    May 14th
    0 Files
  • 15
    May 15th
    0 Files
  • 16
    May 16th
    0 Files
  • 17
    May 17th
    0 Files
  • 18
    May 18th
    0 Files
  • 19
    May 19th
    0 Files
  • 20
    May 20th
    0 Files
  • 21
    May 21st
    0 Files
  • 22
    May 22nd
    0 Files
  • 23
    May 23rd
    0 Files
  • 24
    May 24th
    0 Files
  • 25
    May 25th
    0 Files
  • 26
    May 26th
    0 Files
  • 27
    May 27th
    0 Files
  • 28
    May 28th
    0 Files
  • 29
    May 29th
    0 Files
  • 30
    May 30th
    0 Files
  • 31
    May 31st
    0 Files

Top Authors In Last 30 Days

File Tags

Systems

packet storm

© 2022 Packet Storm. All rights reserved.

Services
Security Services
Hosting By
Rokasec
close