the last unbiased stronghold

OpenSSL Security Advisory 07-Jan-2009

OpenSSL Security Advisory 07-Jan-2009
Posted Jan 7, 2009
Site openssl.org

Several functions inside OpenSSL incorrectly checked the result aftercalling the EVP_VerifyFinal function, allowing a malformed signatureto be treated as a good signature rather than as an error. This issueaffected the signature checks on DSA and ECDSA keys used withSSL/TLS.One way to exploit this flaw would be for a remote attacker who is incontrol of a malicious server or who can use a 'man in the middle'attack to present a malformed SSL/TLS signature from a certificate chainto a vulnerable client, bypassing validation.

tags | advisory, remote
advisories | CVE-2008-5077
MD5 | 5ff1f702db3b6ad0f391aaa8dc65fdbb

OpenSSL Security Advisory 07-Jan-2009

Change Mirror Download
OpenSSL Security Advisory [07-Jan-2009]

Incorrect checks for malformed signatures
===========================================

Several functions inside OpenSSL incorrectly checked the result after
calling the EVP_VerifyFinal function, allowing a malformed signature
to be treated as a good signature rather than as an error. This issue
affected the signature checks on DSA and ECDSA keys used with
SSL/TLS.

One way to exploit this flaw would be for a remote attacker who is in
control of a malicious server or who can use a 'man in the middle'
attack to present a malformed SSL/TLS signature from a certificate chain
to a vulnerable client, bypassing validation.

This vulnerability is tracked as CVE-2008-5077.

The OpenSSL security team would like to thank the Google Security Team
for reporting this issue.

Who is affected?
=================

Everyone using OpenSSL releases prior to 0.9.8j as an SSL/TLS client
when connecting to a server whose certificate contains a DSA or ECDSA key.

Use of OpenSSL as an SSL/TLS client when connecting to a server whose
certificate uses an RSA key is NOT affected.

Verification of client certificates by OpenSSL servers for any key type
is NOT affected.

Recommendations for users of OpenSSL
=====================================

Users of OpenSSL 0.9.8 should update to the OpenSSL 0.9.8j release
which contains a patch to correct this issue.

The patch used is also appended to this advisory for users or
distributions who wish to backport this patch to versions they build
from source.

Recommendations for projects using OpenSSL
===========================================

Projects and products using OpenSSL should audit any use of the
routine EVP_VerifyFinal() to ensure that the return code is being
correctly handled. As documented, this function returns 1 for a
successful verification, 0 for failure, and -1 for an error.

General recommendations
========================

Any server that has clients using OpenSSL verifying DSA or ECDSA
certificates, regardless of the software used by the server, should
either ensure that all clients are upgraded or stop using DSA/ECDSA
certificates. Note that unless certificates are revoked (and clients
check for revocation) impersonation will still be possible until the
certificate expires.

References
===========

URL for this Security Advisory:
http://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20090107.txt


diff -ur openssl-0.9.8i-ORIG/apps/speed.c openssl-0.9.8i/apps/speed.c
--- openssl-0.9.8i/apps/speed.c 2007-11-15 13:33:47.000000000 +0000
+++ openssl-0.9.8i/apps/speed-new.c 2008-12-04 00:00:00.000000000 +0000
@@ -2132,7 +2132,7 @@
{
ret=RSA_verify(NID_md5_sha1, buf,36, buf2,
rsa_num, rsa_key[j]);
- if (ret == 0)
+ if (ret <= 0)
{
BIO_printf(bio_err,
"RSA verify failure\n");
diff -ur openssl-0.9.8i-ORIG/apps/spkac.c openssl-0.9.8i/apps/spkac.c
--- openssl-0.9.8i-ORIG/apps/spkac.c 2005-04-05 19:11:18.000000000 +0000
+++ openssl-0.9.8i/apps/spkac.c 2008-12-04 00:00:00.000000000 +0000
@@ -285,7 +285,7 @@
pkey = NETSCAPE_SPKI_get_pubkey(spki);
if(verify) {
i = NETSCAPE_SPKI_verify(spki, pkey);
- if(i) BIO_printf(bio_err, "Signature OK\n");
+ if (i > 0) BIO_printf(bio_err, "Signature OK\n");
else {
BIO_printf(bio_err, "Signature Failure\n");
ERR_print_errors(bio_err);
diff -ur openssl-0.9.8i-ORIG/apps/verify.c openssl-0.9.8i/apps/verify.c
--- openssl-0.9.8i-ORIG/apps/verify.c 2004-11-29 11:28:07.000000000 +0000
+++ openssl-0.9.8i/apps/verify.c 2008-12-04 00:00:00.600000000 +0000
@@ -266,7 +266,7 @@

ret=0;
end:
- if (i)
+ if (i > 0)
{
fprintf(stdout,"OK\n");
ret=1;
@@ -367,4 +367,3 @@
ERR_clear_error();
return(ok);
}
-
diff -ur openssl-0.9.8i-ORIG/apps/x509.c openssl-0.9.8i/apps/x509.c
--- openssl-0.9.8i-ORIG/apps/x509.c 2007-10-12 00:00:10.000000000 +0000
+++ openssl-0.9.8i/apps/x509.c 2008-12-04 00:00:00.400000000 +0000
@@ -1151,7 +1151,7 @@
/* NOTE: this certificate can/should be self signed, unless it was
* a certificate request in which case it is not. */
X509_STORE_CTX_set_cert(&xsc,x);
- if (!reqfile && !X509_verify_cert(&xsc))
+ if (!reqfile && X509_verify_cert(&xsc) <= 0)
goto end;

if (!X509_check_private_key(xca,pkey))
diff -ur openssl-0.9.8i-ORIG/crypto/cms/cms_sd.c openssl-0.9.8i/crypto/cms/cms_sd.c
--- openssl-0.9.8i-ORIG/crypto/cms/cms_sd.c 2008-04-06 16:30:38.000000000 +0000
+++ openssl-0.9.8i/crypto/cms/cms_sd.c 2008-12-04 00:00:00.400000000 +0000
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@
cms_fixup_mctx(&mctx, si->pkey);
r = EVP_VerifyFinal(&mctx,
si->signature->data, si->signature->length, si->pkey);
- if (!r)
+ if (r <= 0)
CMSerr(CMS_F_CMS_SIGNERINFO_VERIFY, CMS_R_VERIFICATION_FAILURE);
err:
EVP_MD_CTX_cleanup(&mctx);
diff -ur openssl-0.9.8i-ORIG/ssl/s2_clnt.c openssl-0.9.8i/ssl/s2_clnt.c
--- openssl-0.9.8i-ORIG/ssl/s2_clnt.c 2007-09-06 12:43:53.000000000 +0000
+++ openssl-0.9.8i/ssl/s2_clnt.c 2008-12-04 00:00:00.100000000 +0000
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@

i=ssl_verify_cert_chain(s,sk);

- if ((s->verify_mode != SSL_VERIFY_NONE) && (!i))
+ if ((s->verify_mode != SSL_VERIFY_NONE) && (i <= 0))
{
SSLerr(SSL_F_SSL2_SET_CERTIFICATE,SSL_R_CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED);
goto err;
diff -ur openssl-0.9.8i-ORIG/ssl/s2_srvr.c openssl-0.9.8i/ssl/s2_srvr.c
--- openssl-0.9.8i-ORIG/ssl/s2_srvr.c 2007-09-06 12:43:53.000000000 +0000
+++ openssl-0.9.8i/ssl/s2_srvr.c 2008-12-04 00:00:00.900000000 +0000
@@ -1054,7 +1054,7 @@

i=ssl_verify_cert_chain(s,sk);

- if (i) /* we like the packet, now check the chksum */
+ if (i > 0) /* we like the packet, now check the chksum */
{
EVP_MD_CTX ctx;
EVP_PKEY *pkey=NULL;
@@ -1083,7 +1083,7 @@
EVP_PKEY_free(pkey);
EVP_MD_CTX_cleanup(&ctx);

- if (i)
+ if (i > 0)
{
if (s->session->peer != NULL)
X509_free(s->session->peer);
diff -ur openssl-0.9.8i-ORIG/ssl/s3_clnt.c openssl-0.9.8i/ssl/s3_clnt.c
--- openssl-0.9.8i-ORIG/ssl/s3_clnt.c 2008-06-16 16:56:41.000000000 +0000
+++ openssl-0.9.8i/ssl/s3_clnt.c 2008-12-04 00:00:00.100000000 +0000
@@ -972,7 +972,7 @@
}

i=ssl_verify_cert_chain(s,sk);
- if ((s->verify_mode != SSL_VERIFY_NONE) && (!i)
+ if ((s->verify_mode != SSL_VERIFY_NONE) && (i <= 0)
#ifndef OPENSSL_NO_KRB5
&& (s->s3->tmp.new_cipher->algorithms & (SSL_MKEY_MASK|SSL_AUTH_MASK))
!= (SSL_aKRB5|SSL_kKRB5)
@@ -1459,7 +1459,7 @@
EVP_VerifyUpdate(&md_ctx,&(s->s3->client_random[0]),SSL3_RANDOM_SIZE);
EVP_VerifyUpdate(&md_ctx,&(s->s3->server_random[0]),SSL3_RANDOM_SIZE);
EVP_VerifyUpdate(&md_ctx,param,param_len);
- if (!EVP_VerifyFinal(&md_ctx,p,(int)n,pkey))
+ if (EVP_VerifyFinal(&md_ctx,p,(int)n,pkey) <= 0)
{
/* bad signature */
al=SSL_AD_DECRYPT_ERROR;
@@ -1477,7 +1477,7 @@
EVP_VerifyUpdate(&md_ctx,&(s->s3->client_random[0]),SSL3_RANDOM_SIZE);
EVP_VerifyUpdate(&md_ctx,&(s->s3->server_random[0]),SSL3_RANDOM_SIZE);
EVP_VerifyUpdate(&md_ctx,param,param_len);
- if (!EVP_VerifyFinal(&md_ctx,p,(int)n,pkey))
+ if (EVP_VerifyFinal(&md_ctx,p,(int)n,pkey) <= 0)
{
/* bad signature */
al=SSL_AD_DECRYPT_ERROR;
diff -ur openssl-0.9.8i-ORIG/ssl/s3_srvr.c openssl-0.9.8i/ssl/s3_srvr.c
--- openssl-0.9.8i-ORIG/ssl/s3_srvr.c 2008-09-14 18:16:09.000000000 +0000
+++ openssl-0.9.8i/ssl/s3_srvr.c 2008-12-04 00:00:00.100000000 +0000
@@ -2560,7 +2560,7 @@
else
{
i=ssl_verify_cert_chain(s,sk);
- if (!i)
+ if (i <= 0)
{
al=ssl_verify_alarm_type(s->verify_result);
SSLerr(SSL_F_SSL3_GET_CLIENT_CERTIFICATE,SSL_R_NO_CERTIFICATE_RETURNED);
diff -ur openssl-0.9.8i-ORIG/ssl/ssltest.c openssl-0.9.8i/ssl/ssltest.c
--- openssl-0.9.8i-ORIG/ssl/ssltest.c 2008-06-16 16:56:42.000000000 +0000
+++ openssl-0.9.8i/ssl/ssltest.c 2008-12-04 00:00:00.900000000 +0000
@@ -2093,7 +2093,7 @@

if (cb_arg->proxy_auth)
{
- if (ok)
+ if (ok > 0)
{
const char *cond_end = NULL;


Comments

RSS Feed Subscribe to this comment feed

No comments yet, be the first!

Login or Register to post a comment

File Archive:

May 2012

  • Su
  • Mo
  • Tu
  • We
  • Th
  • Fr
  • Sa
  • 1
    May 1st
    37 Files
  • 2
    May 2nd
    53 Files
  • 3
    May 3rd
    33 Files
  • 4
    May 4th
    4 Files
  • 5
    May 5th
    10 Files
  • 6
    May 6th
    17 Files
  • 7
    May 7th
    19 Files
  • 8
    May 8th
    36 Files
  • 9
    May 9th
    34 Files
  • 10
    May 10th
    35 Files
  • 11
    May 11th
    20 Files
  • 12
    May 12th
    18 Files
  • 13
    May 13th
    11 Files
  • 14
    May 14th
    27 Files
  • 15
    May 15th
    58 Files
  • 16
    May 16th
    54 Files
  • 17
    May 17th
    25 Files
  • 18
    May 18th
    53 Files
  • 19
    May 19th
    9 Files
  • 20
    May 20th
    15 Files
  • 21
    May 21st
    25 Files
  • 22
    May 22nd
    32 Files
  • 23
    May 23rd
    35 Files
  • 24
    May 24th
    26 Files
  • 25
    May 25th
    25 Files
  • 26
    May 26th
    0 Files
  • 27
    May 27th
    0 Files
  • 28
    May 28th
    0 Files
  • 29
    May 29th
    0 Files
  • 30
    May 30th
    0 Files
  • 31
    May 31st
    0 Files

Top Authors In Last 30 Days

File Tags

Systems

packet storm

© 2012 Packet Storm. All rights reserved.

close